[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190930120838.vdmmglkbp226hhfq@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:08:38 -0500
From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
CC: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 4/8] media: i2c: ov2659: fix s_stream return value
Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote on Fri [2019-Sep-27 21:33:28 +0100]:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:46 PM Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com> wrote:
> >
> > In ov2659_s_stream() return value for invoked function should be checked
> > and propagated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c | 11 +++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c
> > index f77320e8a60d..cd4625432264 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c
> > @@ -1187,10 +1187,13 @@ static int ov2659_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int on)
> > goto unlock;
> > }
> >
> > - ov2659_set_pixel_clock(ov2659);
> > - ov2659_set_frame_size(ov2659);
> > - ov2659_set_format(ov2659);
> > - ov2659_set_streaming(ov2659, 1);
> > + ret = ov2659_set_pixel_clock(ov2659);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + ret = ov2659_set_frame_size(ov2659);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + ret = ov2659_set_format(ov2659);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + ov2659_set_streaming(ov2659, 1);
> > ov2659->streaming = on;
> >
> the "ov2659->streaming = on;" should only be set if above calls
> succeed, otherwise we might hit -EBUSY during set_fmt.
Thanks, good catch.
Benoit
>
> Cheers,
> --Prabhakar Lad
>
> > unlock:
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists