[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190930120926.t26ydhgggi2scg3e@willie-the-truck>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:09:27 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, youlin.pei@...iatek.com,
anan.sun@...iatek.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
cui.zhang@...iatek.com, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
chao.hao@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/mediatek: Move the tlb_sync into tlb_flush
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:42:22PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> The commit 4d689b619445 ("iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Convert to IOMMU API
> TLB sync") help move the tlb_sync of unmap from v7s into the iommu
> framework. It helps add a new function "mtk_iommu_iotlb_sync", But it
> lacked the dom->pgtlock, then it will cause the variable
> "tlb_flush_active" may be changed unexpectedly, we could see this warning
> log randomly:
>
> mtk-iommu 10205000.iommu: Partial TLB flush timed out, falling back to
> full flush
>
> To fix this issue, we can add dom->pgtlock in the "mtk_iommu_iotlb_sync".
> And when checking this issue, we find that __arm_v7s_unmap call
> io_pgtable_tlb_add_flush consecutively when it is supersection/largepage,
> this also is potential unsafe for us. There is no tlb flush queue in the
> MediaTek M4U HW. The HW always expect the tlb_flush/tlb_sync one by one.
> If v7s don't always gurarantee the sequence, Thus, In this patch I move
> the tlb_sync into tlb_flush(also rename the function deleting "_nosync").
> and we don't care if it is leaf, rearrange the callback functions. Also,
> the tlb flush/sync was already finished in v7s, then iotlb_sync and
> iotlb_sync_all is unnecessary.
>
> Besides, there are two minor changes:
> a) Use writel for the register F_MMU_INV_RANGE which is for triggering the
> HW work. We expect all the setting(iova_start/iova_end...) have already
> been finished before F_MMU_INV_RANGE.
> b) Reduce the tlb timeout value from 100000us to 1000us. the original value
> is so long that affect the multimedia performance.
>
> Fixes: 4d689b619445 ("iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Convert to IOMMU API TLB sync")
> Signed-off-by: Chao Hao <chao.hao@...iatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> ---
> This patch looks break the logic for tlb_flush and tlb_sync. I'm not
> sure if it
> is reasonable. If someone has concern, I could change:
> a) Add dom->pgtlock in the mtk_iommu_iotlb_sync
> b) Add a io_pgtable_tlb_sync in [1].
The patch looks ok to me, but please could you split it up so that the
timeout and writel are done separately?
Thanks,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists