[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190930152240.GA13385@sinkpad>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:22:40 -0400
From: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@...e.com>,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>,
Subhra Mazumdar <subhra.mazumdar@...cle.com>,
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@...italocean.com>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg Kerr <kerrnel@...gle.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] Core scheduling v3
> I've made an attempt in the following two patches to address
> the load balancing of mismatched load between the siblings.
>
> It is applied on top of Aaron's patches:
> - sched: Fix incorrect rq tagged as forced idle
> - wrapper for cfs_rq->min_vruntime
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190725143127.GB992@aaronlu/
> - core vruntime comparison
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190725143248.GC992@aaronlu/
>
> I will love Julien, Aaron and others to try it out. Suggestions
> to tune it is welcomed.
Just letting you know that I will be testing your load balancing patches
this week along with the changes Vineeth is currently doing. I didn't
test it before because I was focused on single threaded and pinned
micro-benchmarks, but I am back on scaling tests so it will be
interesting to see.
Thanks,
Julien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists