[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190930110057.1b11d798@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:00:57 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: use flexible array members, not zero-length
On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 10:55:57 +0200
Stephen Kitt <steve@....org> wrote:
> Wouldn’t it be better to update the docs simultaneously in each patch which
> fixes a structure? Or is that unworkable with current development practices?
Definitely update the two together. The doc fix should just go through
the appropriate maintainer with the code change.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists