linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: Inline status checkers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <16187bf2-b3ff-651c-ddb3-24e38c78dcf0@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:45:20 +0300
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: Inline status checkers

On 30/09/2019 11:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:25:49AM +0300, Pavel Begunkov (Silence) wrote:
>> From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
>>
>> blk_mq_request_completed() and blk_mq_request_started() are
>> short, inline it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  block/blk-mq.c         | 12 ------------
>>  block/blk-mq.h         |  9 ---------
>>  include/linux/blk-mq.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index 279b138a9e50..d97181d9a3ec 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -647,18 +647,6 @@ bool blk_mq_complete_request(struct request *rq)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_complete_request);
>>  
>> -int blk_mq_request_started(struct request *rq)
>> -{
>> -	return blk_mq_rq_state(rq) != MQ_RQ_IDLE;
>> -}
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_request_started);
>> -
>> -int blk_mq_request_completed(struct request *rq)
>> -{
>> -	return blk_mq_rq_state(rq) == MQ_RQ_COMPLETE;
>> -}
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_request_completed);
> 
> How about just killing these helpers instead?
> 
I'm not sure that this is better. That's more intrusive and
blk_mq_request_started() looks clearer than
(blk_mq_rq_state(rq) != MQ_RQ_IDLE).

Anyway, I've sent v2 and fine with both.


-- 
Yours sincerely,
Pavel Begunkov



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)