[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191001184526.GE8171@sasha-vm>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:45:26 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Wei Hu <weh@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
"rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"shc_work@...l.ru" <shc_work@...l.ru>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"baijiaju1990@...il.com" <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
"fthain@...egraphics.com.au" <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
"info@...ux.net" <info@...ux.net>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] video: hyperv: hyperv_fb: Support deferred IO for
Hyper-V frame buffer driver
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 06:02:55AM +0000, Wei Hu wrote:
>Without deferred IO support, hyperv_fb driver informs the host to refresh
>the entire guest frame buffer at fixed rate, e.g. at 20Hz, no matter there
>is screen update or not. This patch supports deferred IO for screens in
>graphics mode and also enables the frame buffer on-demand refresh. The
>highest refresh rate is still set at 20Hz.
>
>Currently Hyper-V only takes a physical address from guest as the starting
>address of frame buffer. This implies the guest must allocate contiguous
>physical memory for frame buffer. In addition, Hyper-V Gen 2 VMs only
>accept address from MMIO region as frame buffer address. Due to these
>limitations on Hyper-V host, we keep a shadow copy of frame buffer
>in the guest. This means one more copy of the dirty rectangle inside
>guest when doing the on-demand refresh. This can be optimized in the
>future with help from host. For now the host performance gain from deferred
>IO outweighs the shadow copy impact in the guest.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wei Hu <weh@...rosoft.com>
What tree is this based on? I can't get it to apply.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists