linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: atmel: fix atmel_ssc_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2idD4as-9ns0NrLjYGYSEc0=6A67VaNXDacA3-tJEr0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Oct 2019 21:02:22 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: atmel: fix atmel_ssc_set_audio link failure

On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:55 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 04:20:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The ssc audio driver can call into both pdc and dma backends.  With the
> > latest rework, the logic to do this in a safe way avoiding link errors
> > was removed, bringing back link errors that were fixed long ago in commit
> > 061981ff8cc8 ("ASoC: atmel: properly select dma driver state") such as
>
> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.

I looked at "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git
for-next"
as well as the for-linus branch in the same place, but found no
conflicting changes
in there compared to v5.4-rc1. Am I looking at the right tree?

       Arnd