[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191001205150.GA26709@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 23:51:50 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Detach page allocation from tpm_buf
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:58:13AM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> TPM2_CC_GET_RANDOM
Ugh, I somehow sent v1 2nd time also in terms of contents (was fixed in
v2).
I think it would be a great idea to add call to tpm_get_random() to the
chip startup as an additional test.
> Would this work here?
>
> err = total ? total : -EIO;
> out:
> kunmap(data_page);
> __free_page(data_page);
> return err;
I'd guess but I want to keep this commit as dumbed down and mechanical
as possible given the amount of changes.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists