linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] can: C_CAN: add bus recovery events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191001074057.GA28813@x1.vandijck-laurijssen.be>
Date:   Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:40:57 +0200
From:   Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@...dijck-laurijssen.be>
To:     Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>
Cc:     "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] can: C_CAN: add bus recovery events

On do, 26 sep 2019 08:50:51 +0000, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> While the state is update when the error counters increase and decrease,
> there is no event when the bus recovers and the error counters decrease
> again. So add that event as well.
> 
> Change the state going downward to be ERROR_PASSIVE -> ERROR_WARNING ->
> ERROR_ACTIVE instead of directly to ERROR_ACTIVE again.

This looks like a proper thing to do
Acked-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@...dijck-laurijssen.be>