[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b55e753-5797-2bdc-fae6-f575a0ef8186@web.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:11:34 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: gpio: prevent memory leak in spi_gpio_probe
> … In order to avoid leak spi_contriller_put must
> be called in case of failure for devm_add_action_or_reset.
How does this wording fit to the diff display that you would like
to add the function call “spi_master_put(master)” in
one if branch?
> Fixes: 8b797490b4db ("spi: gpio: Make sure spi_master_put() is called in every error path")
Is there a need to complete the corresponding exception handling
at any more source code places?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists