[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <457e2714b0cdf05eb404b8efcf5b8c6c0c47aeaa.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 12:00:52 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Aaron Hill <aa1ronham@...il.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mac80211: Disable preeemption when updating stat
counters
On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:41 -0400, Aaron Hill wrote:
> The mac80211 subsystem maintains per-cpu stat counters for receive and
> transmit operations. Previously, preemption was not disabled when
> updating these counters. This creates a race condition where two cpus
> could attempt to update the same counters using non-atomic operations.
>
> This was causing a
> 'BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code'
> message to be printed, along with a stacktrace. This was reported
> in a few different places:
>
> * https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg189992.html
> * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204127
>
> This patch adds calls to preempt_disable() and preempt_enable()
> surrounding the updating of the stat counters.
That seems like basically the same as what Jiri reported, but now I'm
even more confused...
Ah. CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU...
But if we keep BHs disabled, it should still be OK, so what I suggested
to Jiri will also address this I think?
diff --git a/net/mac80211/util.c b/net/mac80211/util.c
index 051a02ddcb85..ad1e88958da2 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/util.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/util.c
@@ -273,9 +273,9 @@ static void __ieee80211_wake_txqs(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, int ac)
&txqi->flags))
continue;
- spin_unlock_bh(&fq->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&fq->lock);
drv_wake_tx_queue(local, txqi);
- spin_lock_bh(&fq->lock);
+ spin_lock(&fq->lock);
}
}
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists