linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf inject --jit: Remove //anon mmap events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191001022006.GG8560@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:20:06 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Steve MacLean <Steve.MacLean@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Eric Saint-Etienne <eric.saint.etienne@...cle.com>,
        John Keeping <john@...anate.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brian Robbins <brianrob@...rosoft.com>,
        Tom McDonald <Thomas.McDonald@...rosoft.com>,
        John Salem <josalem@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf inject --jit: Remove //anon mmap events

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 08:49:00PM +0000, Steve MacLean wrote:
> SNIP
> 
> > I can't apply this one:
> 
> > patching file builtin-inject.c
> > Hunk #1 FAILED at 263.
> > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file builtin-inject.c.rej 
> 
> I assume this is because I based my patches on the wrong tip.
> 
> > patching file util/jitdump.c
> > patch: **** malformed patch at line 236: btree, node);
> 
> This doesn't make sense to me.  The patch doesn't try to inject near line 236. There aren't 236 lines in the e-mail....

Most likely your mail client did line wrap.

See Documentation/process/email-clients.rst

-Andi