[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9EF87E3C-6CE0-4AD2-B2F9-C7FF9D978AFD@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 19:20:01 +0800
From: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "Input: elantech - enable SMBus on new (2018+)
systems"
Hi Benjamin,
> On Oct 1, 2019, at 15:08, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> This reverts commit 883a2a80f79ca5c0c105605fafabd1f3df99b34c.
>
> Apparently use dmi_get_bios_year() as manufacturing date isn't accurate
> and this breaks older laptops with new BIOS update.
>
> So let's revert this patch.
>
> There are still new HP laptops still need to use SMBus to support all
> features, but it'll be enabled via a whitelist.
Before I make a manifest of devices, do you have any idea of the uniqueness of PNP IDs?
Or should I use DMI strings in this case?
Kai-Heng
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> index 04fe43440a3c..2d8434b7b623 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
> @@ -1827,31 +1827,6 @@ static int elantech_create_smbus(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> leave_breadcrumbs);
> }
>
> -static bool elantech_use_host_notify(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> - struct elantech_device_info *info)
> -{
> - if (ETP_NEW_IC_SMBUS_HOST_NOTIFY(info->fw_version))
> - return true;
> -
> - switch (info->bus) {
> - case ETP_BUS_PS2_ONLY:
> - /* expected case */
> - break;
> - case ETP_BUS_SMB_HST_NTFY_ONLY:
> - case ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_HST_NTFY:
> - /* SMbus implementation is stable since 2018 */
> - if (dmi_get_bios_year() >= 2018)
> - return true;
> - /* fall through */
> - default:
> - psmouse_dbg(psmouse,
> - "Ignoring SMBus bus provider %d\n", info->bus);
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * elantech_setup_smbus - called once the PS/2 devices are enumerated
> * and decides to instantiate a SMBus InterTouch device.
> @@ -1871,7 +1846,7 @@ static int elantech_setup_smbus(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> * i2c_blacklist_pnp_ids.
> * Old ICs are up to the user to decide.
> */
> - if (!elantech_use_host_notify(psmouse, info) ||
> + if (!ETP_NEW_IC_SMBUS_HOST_NOTIFY(info->fw_version) ||
> psmouse_matches_pnp_id(psmouse, i2c_blacklist_pnp_ids))
> return -ENXIO;
> }
> @@ -1891,6 +1866,34 @@ static int elantech_setup_smbus(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool elantech_use_host_notify(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> + struct elantech_device_info *info)
> +{
> + if (ETP_NEW_IC_SMBUS_HOST_NOTIFY(info->fw_version))
> + return true;
> +
> + switch (info->bus) {
> + case ETP_BUS_PS2_ONLY:
> + /* expected case */
> + break;
> + case ETP_BUS_SMB_ALERT_ONLY:
> + /* fall-through */
> + case ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_ALERT:
> + psmouse_dbg(psmouse, "Ignoring SMBus provider through alert protocol.\n");
> + break;
> + case ETP_BUS_SMB_HST_NTFY_ONLY:
> + /* fall-through */
> + case ETP_BUS_PS2_SMB_HST_NTFY:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + psmouse_dbg(psmouse,
> + "Ignoring SMBus bus provider %d.\n",
> + info->bus);
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> int elantech_init_smbus(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> {
> struct elantech_device_info info;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists