[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <AA43245E-9049-49DB-A961-1AFC4A47F68D@lca.pw>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 07:22:36 -0400
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, thgarnie@...gle.com, tytso@....edu,
cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Avoid spurious lock dependencies
> On Oct 1, 2019, at 5:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Does the below adequately describe the situation?
Yes, looks fine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists