linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: fill header with kernel-doc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <349b7e6a-fcf3-e1f3-2674-50f316bda9bf@collabora.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:01:42 -0300
From:   André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, kernel@...labora.com, krisman@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: fill header with kernel-doc

On 9/30/19 7:01 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 9/30/19 12:48 PM, André Almeida wrote:
>> Insert documentation for structs, enums and functions at header file.
>> Format existing and new comments at struct blk_mq_ops as
>> kernel-doc comments.
> 
> Hi André,
> 
> Seeing the documentation being improved is great. However, this patch
> conflicts with a patch series in my tree and that I plan to post soon.
> So I would appreciate it if this patch would be withheld until after my
> patch series has been accepted.
>

Sure, no problem. If it helps the workflow, I could rebase my patch at
the top of your tree.


> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
>