linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] lib/vsprintf: Print time64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191001121321.GB4106@piout.net>
Date:   Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:13:21 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] lib/vsprintf: Print time64_t in human readable
 format

On 01/10/2019 15:11:54+0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 01:48:16PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 01/10/2019 14:36:55+0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:08:09PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > > > Maybe be rtc_str should take a struct tm instead of an rtc_time so
> > > > > > time64_to_rtc_time always uses time64_to_tm.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Because this one, while sounding plausible, maybe too invasive on current
> > > > > state of affairs.
> > > > 
> > > > Well, if the kernel struct tm had an int tm_year instead of long
> > > > tm_year, then you could simply cast a struct rtc_time to a struct tm.
> > > 
> > > I don't think so. It will be error prone from endianess prospective on
> > > 64-bit platforms.
> > > 
> > 
> > I don't get why, as long as the first members of both structs are the
> > same, this should work.
> 
> On BE 64-bit we will always get tm_year == 0, won't we?
> 

Not if you have int tm_year in struct tm. I guess we can change the
kernel struct tm because it is not part of the ABI.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com