linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 03/22] thunderbolt: Log warning if adding switch fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191001121804.GC2951658@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:18:04 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
        Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
        Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>,
        Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@...look.com.au>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Mario.Limonciello@...l.com,
        Anthony Wong <anthony.wong@...onical.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/22] thunderbolt: Log warning if adding switch fails

On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 02:38:11PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> If we fail to add a switch for some reason log a warning with the error
> code. This is useful for debugging.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> index 1f7a9e1cc09c..541295be9bfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/tb.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static void tb_scan_port(struct tb_port *port)
>  	struct tb_cm *tcm = tb_priv(port->sw->tb);
>  	struct tb_port *upstream_port;
>  	struct tb_switch *sw;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (tb_is_upstream_port(port))
>  		return;
> @@ -203,7 +204,9 @@ static void tb_scan_port(struct tb_port *port)
>  	if (!tcm->hotplug_active)
>  		dev_set_uevent_suppress(&sw->dev, true);
>  
> -	if (tb_switch_add(sw)) {
> +	ret = tb_switch_add(sw);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_warn(&sw->dev, "failed to register switch: %d\n", ret);

Shouldn't tb_switch_add() do the error reporting instead?  That way it
makes it easier to call functions and not always have to print failure
messages :)

thanks,

greg k-h