linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 01/22] thunderbolt: Introduce tb_switch_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191001135246.GV2714@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:52:46 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mario.Limonciello@...l.com
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        andreas.noever@...il.com, michael.jamet@...el.com,
        YehezkelShB@...il.com, rajmohan.mani@...el.com,
        nicholas.johnson-opensource@...look.com.au, lukas@...ner.de,
        stern@...land.harvard.edu, anthony.wong@...onical.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/22] thunderbolt: Introduce tb_switch_is_icm()

On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 01:50:13PM +0000, Mario.Limonciello@...l.com wrote:
> > Here at Intel we use term "SW CM" and "FW CM" and IMHO they are better
> > than ECM/ICM. But if people insist I can change them.
> 
> I do agree with you, SW CM and FW CM are clearer than ECM/ICM, maybe just reference
> both in the comments so if someone is aware of ECM/ICM from some documents they
> can relate the two concepts.

Sure, I'll do that in the next version.