[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUMgDBo1gkvQ_Bd8mjMiPjdWWY=9AU6K1S7NcJy5jhvGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:31:37 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: don't export unused return_address()
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:47 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> Without the frame pointer enabled, return_address() is an inline
> function and does not need to be exported, as shown by this warning:
>
> WARNING: "return_address" [vmlinux] is a static EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>
> Move the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() into the #ifdef as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Thanks for your patch!
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ void *return_address(unsigned int level)
> return NULL;
> }
>
Checkpatch doesn't like the empty line above:
WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); should immediately follow its function/variable
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);
> +
> #endif /* if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND) */
>
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists