[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191001144513.GW8171@sasha-vm>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:45:13 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.3 087/203] ASoC: mediatek: mt6358: add delay
after dmic clock on
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:21:59AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 02:41:53PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@...iatek.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit ccb1fa21ef58a2ac15519bb878470762e967e8b3 ]
>>
>> Most dmics produce a high level when they receive clock. The difference
>> between power-on and memory record time is about 10ms, but the dmic
>> needs 50ms to output normal data.
>>
>> This commit add 100ms delay after SoC output clock so that we can cut
>> off the pop noise at the beginning.
>
>This might mess up a production system, please don't backport it.
>In general delays to eliminate pops and clicks that are part of
>the PCM statup path (as opposed to DAPM) are not safe to
>backport.
Okay, I'll drop it, thanks.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists