[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191001152422.GA31358@pi3>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 17:24:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: sram: Convert SRAM bindings to
json-schema
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 09:00:03AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 07:31:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Convert generic mmio-sram bindings to DT schema format using
> > json-schema.
>
> I've been slow getting to this because I started on the same thing...
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > 1. Indent example with four spaces (more readable).
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.txt | 80 ----------
> > .../devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml | 138 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.txt
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..8d9d6ce494b2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/sram/sram.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Generic on-chip SRAM
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - FIXME <who@...uld.it.be>
>
> You can put me.
Sure.
>
> > +
> > +description: |+
> > + Simple IO memory regions to be managed by the genalloc API.
> > +
> > + Each child of the sram node specifies a region of reserved memory. Each
> > + child node should use a 'reg' property to specify a specific range of
> > + reserved memory.
> > +
> > + Following the generic-names recommended practice, node names should
> > + reflect the purpose of the node. Unit address (@<address>) should be
> > + appended to the name.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + $nodename:
> > + pattern: "^sram(@.*)?"
> > +
> > + compatible:
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - mmio-sram
> > + - atmel,sama5d2-securam
>
> I was trying to go down the path of putting all the compatibles for
> various SRAM bindings here, but I ran into some issues. I need to
> revisit as I've forgotten the exact issue.
>
> This would need to be a 'contains' if this is going to work for others.
OK.
>
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + "#address-cells":
> > + description: Should use the same values as the root node.
> > +
> > + "#size-cells":
> > + description: Should use the same values as the root node.
>
> I defined both of these to be 1 as 4GB of SRAM should be enough for a
> while. We can debate 1 or 2 cells vs. 1, but there's no reason it has to
> be the same as the root (unless we're failing to do address
> translation).
That was copied from txt version. I can adjust them to 1 although this
is will more than simple conversion.
>
> > +
> > + ranges:
> > + description:
> > + Should translate from local addresses within the sram to bus addresses.
> > +
> > + no-memory-wc:
> > + description:
> > + The flag indicating, that SRAM memory region has not to be remapped
> > + as write combining. WC is used by default.
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > + # TODO: additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > + "^([a-z]*-)?sram@[a-f0-9]$":
> > + type: object
> > + description:
> > + Each child of the sram node specifies a region of reserved memory.
> > + properties:
> > + reg:
> > + description:
> > + IO mem address range, relative to the SRAM range.
>
> maxItems: 1
OK
>
> > +
> > + compatible:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> > + description:
> > + Should contain a vendor specific string in the form
> > + <vendor>,[<device>-]<usage>
> > +
> > + pool:
> > + description:
> > + Indicates that the particular reserved SRAM area is addressable
> > + and in use by another device or devices.
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > + export:
> > + description:
> > + Indicates that the reserved SRAM area may be accessed outside
> > + of the kernel, e.g. by bootloader or userspace.
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > + protect-exec:
> > + description: |
> > + Same as 'pool' above but with the additional constraint that code
> > + will be run from the region and that the memory is maintained as
> > + read-only, executable during code execution. NOTE: This region must
> > + be page aligned on start and end in order to properly allow
> > + manipulation of the page attributes.
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > + label:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
>
> Already has a type definition.
OK
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists