[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191001162121.67109-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:21:21 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: will@...nel.org
Cc: arnd@...db.de, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, nsaenzjulienne@...e.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Partially revert "compiler: enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING
forcibly"
> So you'd prefer I do something like the diff below?
Yes, I find that diff preferable. Use __always_inline only when absolutely
necessary. Even then, it sounds like this is a workaround for one compiler,
so it should probably also have a comment. (I don't mind changing this for
all compilers).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists