linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: pxa: migrate to new i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:39:10 -0500
From:   Patrick Williams <alpawi@...zon.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Patrick Williams <patrick@...cx.xyz>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Max Staudt <max@...as.org>,
        Juergen Fitschen <jfi@...-embedded.de>,
        Elie Morisse <syniurge@...il.com>,
        Ajay Gupta <ajayg@...dia.com>, Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
        "Paul Cercueil" <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>,
        "Allison Randal" <allison@...utok.net>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: pxa: migrate to new i2c_slave APIs

Thanks for the review Andy.

On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:29:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:59:59AM -0500, Patrick Williams wrote:
> There are quite a few people in the Cc list. I'm not sure they all are
> interested in this. I deliberately dropped few names, sorry, if I was mistaken.

Agree it was kind of a big list.  Just chose what was given to me by
get_maintainer.pl.  It seems like there isn't a direct identified
maintainer of this file.

> 
> > +		if (isr & ISR_RWM) {
> > +			u8 byte = 0;
> > +
> > +			i2c_slave_event(i2c->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED,
> > +					&byte);
> > +			writel(byte, _IDBR(i2c));
> > +		} else {
> > +			i2c_slave_event(i2c->slave, I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED,
> > +					NULL);
> > +		}
> 
> Hmm... Perhaps
> 
> 		u8 byte = 0;
> 
> 		i2c_slave_event(i2c->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, &byte);
> 		if (isr & ISR_RWM)
> 			writel(byte, _IDBR(i2c));
> 

The two different paths also require READ_REQUEST vs WRITE_REQUESTED.  I
could do a ternary there but it seemed more obvious to just unroll the
logic.

-- 
- Patrick