lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191002092901.GB9952@pi3>
Date:   Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:29:01 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: power: Convert Generic Power Domain
 bindings to json-schema

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:00:06AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 05:28:12PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Convert Generic Power Domain bindings to DT schema format using
> > json-schema.  The consumer bindings are split to separate file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > TODO:
> > 1. How the consumer bindings should match nodes?
> 
> How it already done. The consumer binding is always applied so we 
> always apply the type schema to the consumer properties. Device specific 
> bindings have to list the consumer properties because they need to 
> define how many power domains and the names.

I'll apply then select:true so the "required-opps" will be matched.

> 
> > 2. Somehow the example complains:
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.example.dt.yaml: power-controller@...41000: power-domains:0: [1, 0] is too long
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.example.dt.yaml: power-controller@...41000: power-domains:0:1: missing phandle tag in 0
> 
> You used 'phandle' instead of 'phandle-array'. If you have cells, the 
> latter is used. Perhaps we should distinguish between having cells or no 
> cells.

Thanks, I'll drop it anyway as it is duplicating dt-schema.

> 
> > 3. Current matching by node name causes false positives:
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-icev2.dt.yaml: power-controller@2d: '#power-domain-cells' is a required property
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-cm-qs600.dt.yaml: power-controller@...9000: '#power-domain-cells' is a required property
> 
> They should have different node names if they are not power-domain 
> providers.
> 
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt      |   2 +-
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt      |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt        |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/clock/clk-exynos-audss.txt       |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/clock/exynos5433-clock.txt       |   4 +-
> >  .../bindings/clock/renesas,cpg-mssr.txt       |   2 +-
> >  .../clock/renesas,r8a7778-cpg-clocks.txt      |   2 +-
> >  .../clock/renesas,r8a7779-cpg-clocks.txt      |   2 +-
> >  .../clock/renesas,rcar-gen2-cpg-clocks.txt    |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/clock/renesas,rz-cpg-clocks.txt  |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/clock/ti/davinci/psc.txt         |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/display/etnaviv/etnaviv-drm.txt  |   2 +-
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dpu.txt   |   2 +-
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/mdp5.txt  |   2 +-
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/dsp/fsl,dsp.yaml      |   2 +-
> >  .../firmware/nvidia,tegra186-bpmp.txt         |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/media/imx7-mipi-csi2.txt         |   3 +-
> >  .../bindings/media/mediatek-jpeg-decoder.txt  |   3 +-
> >  .../bindings/media/mediatek-mdp.txt           |   3 +-
> >  .../bindings/opp/qcom-nvmem-cpufreq.txt       |   2 +-
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-keystone.txt  |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/phy/ti,phy-am654-serdes.txt      |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/power/amlogic,meson-gx-pwrc.txt  |   2 +-
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/power/fsl,imx-gpc.txt |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/power/fsl,imx-gpcv2.txt          |   2 +-
> >  .../power/power-domain-consumers.yaml         | 124 +++++++++++
> >  .../bindings/power/power-domain.yaml          | 136 ++++++++++++
> >  .../bindings/power/power_domain.txt           | 205 ------------------
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.txt  |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/power/renesas,rcar-sysc.txt      |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rmobile.txt   |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/power/xlnx,zynqmp-genpd.txt      |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/soc/bcm/brcm,bcm2835-pm.txt      |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/soc/mediatek/scpsys.txt          |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/soc/ti/sci-pm-domain.txt         |   2 +-
> >  .../bindings/usb/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt     |   4 +-
> >  MAINTAINERS                                   |   2 +-
> >  37 files changed, 299 insertions(+), 241 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain-consumers.yaml
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> >  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain-consumers.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain-consumers.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..95cc6da1e8a8
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain-consumers.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/power/power-domain-consumers.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: PM domain consumers
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> > +  - Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
> > +  - Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> > +
> > +description: |+
> > +  See power-domain.yaml
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > +  - $ref: /schemas/power-domain/power-domain-consumer.yaml
> > +
> > +# TODO: missing select (compatible?)
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  power-domains:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > +    description:
> > +      A list of PM domain specifiers, as defined by bindings of the power
> > +      controller that is the PM domain provider.
> > +
> > +  power-domain-names:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
> > +    description:
> > +      A list of power domain name strings sorted in the same order
> > +      as the power-domains property. Consumers drivers will use
> > +      power-domain-names to match power domains with power-domains specifiers.
> 
> Why are we duplicating this?

My bad.

> 
> > +
> > +  required-opps:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > +    description:
> > +      This contains phandle to an OPP node in another device's OPP table.
> > +      It may contain an array of phandles, where each phandle points to an OPP
> > +      of a different device. It should not contain multiple phandles to the OPP
> > +      nodes in the same OPP table. This specifies the minimum required OPP
> > +      of the device(s), whose OPP's phandle is present in this property,
> > +      for the functioning of the current device at the current OPP (where this
> > +      property is present).
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - power-domains
> > +
> > +dependencies:
> > +  power-domain-names: [ power-domains ]
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    leaky-device@...50000 {
> > +      compatible = "foo,i-leak-current";
> > +      reg = <0x12350000 0x1000>;
> > +      power-domains = <&power 0>;
> > +      power-domain-names = "io";
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    leaky-device@...51000 {
> > +      compatible = "foo,i-leak-current";
> > +      reg = <0x12351000 0x1000>;
> > +      power-domains = <&power 0>, <&power 1> ;
> > +      power-domain-names = "io", "clk";
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    // The first example above defines a typical PM domain consumer device, which is
> > +    // located inside a PM domain with index 0 of a power controller represented by a
> > +    // node with the label "power".
> > +    // In the second example the consumer device are partitioned across two PM domains,
> > +    // the first with index 0 and the second with index 1, of a power controller that
> > +    // is represented by a node with the label "power".
> > +
> > +  - |
> > +    // Example with  OPP table for domain provider that provides two domains:
> > +
> > +    domain0_opp_table: opp-table0 {
> > +      compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> > +
> > +      domain0_opp_0: opp-1000000000 {
> > +        opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
> > +        opp-microvolt = <975000 970000 985000>;
> > +      };
> > +      domain0_opp_1: opp-1100000000 {
> > +        opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1100000000>;
> > +        opp-microvolt = <1000000 980000 1010000>;
> > +      };
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    domain1_opp_table: opp-table1 {
> > +      compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> > +
> > +      domain1_opp_0: opp-1200000000 {
> > +        opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
> > +        opp-microvolt = <975000 970000 985000>;
> > +      };
> > +      domain1_opp_1: opp-1300000000 {
> > +        opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1300000000>;
> > +        opp-microvolt = <1000000 980000 1010000>;
> > +      };
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    power: power-controller@...40000 {
> > +      compatible = "foo,power-controller";
> > +      reg = <0x12340000 0x1000>;
> > +      #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> > +      operating-points-v2 = <&domain0_opp_table>, <&domain1_opp_table>;
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    leaky-device0@...50000 {
> > +      compatible = "foo,i-leak-current";
> > +      reg = <0x12350000 0x1000>;
> > +      power-domains = <&power 0>;
> > +      required-opps = <&domain0_opp_0>;
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    leaky-device1@...50000 {
> > +      compatible = "foo,i-leak-current";
> > +      reg = <0x12350000 0x1000>;
> > +      power-domains = <&power 1>;
> > +      required-opps = <&domain1_opp_1>;
> > +    };
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..9454fdb904ae
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/power/power-domain.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Generic PM domains
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> > +  - Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
> > +  - Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> > +
> > +description: |+
> > +  System on chip designs are often divided into multiple PM domains that can be
> > +  used for power gating of selected IP blocks for power saving by reduced leakage
> > +  current.
> > +
> > +  This device tree binding can be used to bind PM domain consumer devices with
> > +  their PM domains provided by PM domain providers. A PM domain provider can be
> > +  represented by any node in the device tree and can provide one or more PM
> > +  domains. A consumer node can refer to the provider by a phandle and a set of
> > +  phandle arguments (so called PM domain specifiers) of length specified by the
> > +  \#power-domain-cells property in the PM domain provider node.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  $nodename:
> > +    pattern: "^(power-controller|power-domain)(@.*)?"
> > +
> > +  domain-idle-states:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > +    description:
> > +      A phandle of an idle-state that shall be soaked into a generic domain
> > +      power state. The idle state definitions are compatible with
> > +      domain-idle-state specified in
> > +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/domain-idle-state.txt
> > +      phandles that are not compatible with domain-idle-state will be ignored.
> > +      The domain-idle-state property reflects the idle state of this PM domain
> > +      and not the idle states of the devices or sub-domains in the PM domain.
> > +      Devices and sub-domains have their own idle-states independent
> > +      of the parent domain's idle states. In the absence of this property,
> > +      the domain would be considered as capable of being powered-on
> > +      or powered-off.
> > +
> > +  operating-points-v2:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> 
> This needs to be defined as part of an OPP schema. I guess there's some 
> value listing it here, but a device specific binding will still have to 
> list it to define how many entries.

So for now I'll leave it here. Consecutive patches can split it.

> 
> > +    description:
> > +      Phandles to the OPP tables of power domains provided by a power domain
> > +      provider. If the provider provides a single power domain only or all
> > +      the power domains provided by the provider have identical OPP tables,
> > +      then this shall contain a single phandle. Refer to ../opp/opp.txt
> > +      for more information.
> > +
> > +  "#power-domain-cells":
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> 
> Strictly speaking, we don't need to define the type as '#.*-cells' has a 
> type.

OK

> 
> > +    description:
> > +      Number of cells in a PM domain specifier. Typically 0 for nodes
> > +      representing a single PM domain and 1 for nodes providing multiple PM
> > +      domains (e.g. power controllers), but can be any value as specified
> > +      by device tree binding documentation of particular provider.
> > +
> > +  power-domains:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> 
> Don't need type here either.

OK

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ