[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191002170253.GA9634@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 20:03:10 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2,RESEND] tpm: Detach page allocation from tpm_buf
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:45:30PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> As has been seen recently, binding the buffer allocation and tpm_buf
> together is sometimes far from optimal. The buffer might come from the
> caller namely when tpm_send() is used by another subsystem. In addition we
> can stability in call sites w/o rollback (e.g. power events)>
>
> Take allocation out of the tpm_buf framework and make it purely a wrapper
> for the data buffer.
OK, so the reason that the fix for the CC was not included, was that
it was in my staging area. I had not amended it :-/
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists