[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191002183327.grhkxlbyu65vvhr4@pburton-laptop>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:33:28 +0000
From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
CC: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] nvmem: core: add nvmem_device_find
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 11:11:58AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> On 23/09/2019 12:46, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > nvmem_device_find provides a way to search for nvmem devices with
> > the help of a match function simlair to bus_find_device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>
> > ---
>
> Thanks for the patch,
> This patch looks good for me.
>
> Do you know which tree is going to pick this series up?
>
> I can either apply this patch to nvmem tree
>
> or here is my Ack for this patch to take it via other trees.
>
> Reviewed-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
> Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Thanks - if you don't mind I'll take this through mips-next along with
the following patch that depends on it.
Thomas: I see patch 3 has an issue reported by the kbuild test robot,
and still needs acks from the MFD & network maintainers. Can I
presume it's safe to apply patches 1 & 2 without 3 & 4 in the
meantime?
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists