[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191002184757.GG4643@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 20:47:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...e.de, lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, pjt@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
qperret@...rret.net, dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:25:52PM +0200, Giovanni Gherdovich wrote:
> > What about KABYLAKE_X and ICELAKE_X ?
>
> KABYLAKE_X: does it exist? I couldn't find it in
> arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h (the tip tree), I only see KABYLAKE_L and
> KABYLAKE.
My bad, I must've been staring cross-eyed at intel-family.h.
> If the SDM is outdated and ICELAKE_X is also in that category, then the
> turbostat source code is outdated too as it has this function to detect this
> feature:
I think you can trust the turbostat code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists