linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] PM / Domains: Add tracepoints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Oct 2019 21:10:23 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM / Domains: Add tracepoints

On Tue 2019-10-01 12:37:01, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 02:08:46PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:42:35 -0700
> > Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 01:03:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:35:42 -0700
> > > > Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > >   
> > > > > How about this instead:
> > > > > 
> > > > >   Add tracepoints for genpd_power_on, genpd_power_off and
> > > > >   genpd_set_performance_state. The tracepoints can help with
> > > > >   understanding power domain behavior of a given device, which
> > > > >   may be particularly interesting for battery powered devices
> > > > >   and suspend/resume.  
> > > > 
> > > > Do you have a use case example to present?  
> > > 
> > > TBH I'm not looking into a specific use case right now. While
> > > peeking around in /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events to learn more
> > > about existing tracepoints that might be relevant for my work
> > > I noticed the absence of genpd ones and it seemed a good idea to
> > > add them preemptively. Conceptually they seem similar to the
> > > existing regulator_enable/disable and cpu_idle tracepoints.
> > > 
> > > As an abstract use case I could see power analysis on battery
> > > powered devices during suspend. genpd_power_on/off allow to see
> > > which power domains remain on during suspend, and might give
> > > insights for possible power saving options. Examples could be that
> > > a power domain stays unexpectedly on due to a misconfiguration, or
> > > two power domains remain on when it could be only one if you just
> > > moved that one pin/port over to the other domain in the next
> > > hardware revision.
> > 
> > If the power management maintainers have no issues with adding these,
> > then neither do I ;-)  It would be them who would pull them in anyway.
> 
> Ok, I'll send a new version with the changes you suggested and some more
> info in the commit message, unless PM maintainers raise concerns before
> that.

Dunno. Adding tracepoints because someone might need them for, umm,
something... I'd wait until they are actually needed.

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)