linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 58/87] cifs: add spinlock for the openFileList to cifsInodeInfo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1570043211.844466427@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 02 Oct 2019 20:06:51 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
        "Ronnie Sahlberg" <lsahlber@...hat.com>,
        "Steve French" <stfrench@...rosoft.com>,
        "Pavel Shilovsky" <pshilov@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 58/87] cifs: add spinlock for the openFileList to
 cifsInodeInfo

3.16.75-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>

commit 487317c99477d00f22370625d53be3239febabbe upstream.

We can not depend on the tcon->open_file_lock here since in multiuser mode
we may have the same file/inode open via multiple different tcons.

The current code is race prone and will crash if one user deletes a file
at the same time a different user opens/create the file.

To avoid this we need to have a spinlock attached to the inode and not the tcon.

RHBZ:  1580165

Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@...rosoft.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context, indentation]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 fs/cifs/cifsfs.c   | 1 +
 fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 5 +++++
 fs/cifs/file.c     | 8 ++++++--
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ cifs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
 	cifs_inode->uniqueid = 0;
 	cifs_inode->createtime = 0;
 	cifs_inode->epoch = 0;
+	spin_lock_init(&cifs_inode->open_file_lock);
 #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2
 	generate_random_uuid(cifs_inode->lease_key);
 #endif
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
@@ -1116,6 +1116,7 @@ struct cifsInodeInfo {
 	struct rw_semaphore lock_sem;	/* protect the fields above */
 	/* BB add in lists for dirty pages i.e. write caching info for oplock */
 	struct list_head openFileList;
+	spinlock_t	open_file_lock;	/* protects openFileList */
 	__u32 cifsAttrs; /* e.g. DOS archive bit, sparse, compressed, system */
 	unsigned int oplock;		/* oplock/lease level we have */
 	unsigned int epoch;		/* used to track lease state changes */
@@ -1485,10 +1486,14 @@ require use of the stronger protocol */
  *  tcp_ses_lock protects:
  *	list operations on tcp and SMB session lists
  *  tcon->open_file_lock protects the list of open files hanging off the tcon
+ *  inode->open_file_lock protects the openFileList hanging off the inode
  *  cfile->file_info_lock protects counters and fields in cifs file struct
  *  f_owner.lock protects certain per file struct operations
  *  mapping->page_lock protects certain per page operations
  *
+ *  Note that the cifs_tcon.open_file_lock should be taken before
+ *  not after the cifsInodeInfo.open_file_lock
+ *
  *  Semaphores
  *  ----------
  *  sesSem     operations on smb session
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -337,10 +337,12 @@ cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid,
 	list_add(&cfile->tlist, &tcon->openFileList);
 
 	/* if readable file instance put first in list*/
+	spin_lock(&cinode->open_file_lock);
 	if (file->f_mode & FMODE_READ)
 		list_add(&cfile->flist, &cinode->openFileList);
 	else
 		list_add_tail(&cfile->flist, &cinode->openFileList);
+	spin_unlock(&cinode->open_file_lock);
 	spin_unlock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
 
 	if (fid->purge_cache)
@@ -412,7 +414,9 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileIn
 	cifs_add_pending_open_locked(&fid, cifs_file->tlink, &open);
 
 	/* remove it from the lists */
+	spin_lock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
 	list_del(&cifs_file->flist);
+	spin_unlock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
 	list_del(&cifs_file->tlist);
 
 	if (list_empty(&cifsi->openFileList)) {
@@ -1850,10 +1854,10 @@ refind_writable:
 		if (!rc)
 			return inv_file;
 		else {
-			spin_lock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
+			spin_lock(&cifs_inode->open_file_lock);
 			list_move_tail(&inv_file->flist,
 					&cifs_inode->openFileList);
-			spin_unlock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
+			spin_unlock(&cifs_inode->open_file_lock);
 			cifsFileInfo_put(inv_file);
 			++refind;
 			inv_file = NULL;