[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191003161621.GJ21629@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 17:16:21 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Cc: ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
will@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] arm64: vdso32: Fix syncconfig errors.
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:41:51PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> > index 84a3d502c5a5..dfa6a5cb99e4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> > @@ -53,20 +53,12 @@ $(warning Detected assembler with broken .inst; disassembly will be unreliable)
> > endif
> > endif
> >
> > +COMPATCC ?= $(CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT)gcc
> > +export COMPATCC
> > +
> > ifeq ($(CONFIG_GENERIC_COMPAT_VDSO), y)
> > - CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT ?= $(CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT_VDSO:"%"=%)
> > -
> > - ifeq ($(CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG), y)
> > - $(warning CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT is clang, the compat vDSO will not be built)
> > - else ifeq ($(strip $(CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT)),)
> > - $(warning CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT not defined or empty, the compat vDSO will not be built)
> > - else ifeq ($(shell which $(CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT)gcc 2> /dev/null),)
> > - $(error $(CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT)gcc not found, check CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT)
> > - else
> > - export CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT
> > - export CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO := y
> > - compat_vdso := -DCONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO=1
> > - endif
> > + export CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO := y
> > + compat_vdso := -DCONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO=1
> > endif
>
> With this change, if I don't have any CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT in my
> environment, the kernel fails to build because COMPATCC becomes gcc
> which cannot build the vdso32. What I really want is not to warn me, nor
> fail to build the kernel when I don't care about the compat vDSO (e.g. I
> have a 64-bit only machine).
>
> What saved us before was the COMPATCC_IS_ARM_GCC check and a selection
> of the GENERIC_COMPAT_VDSO dependent on this check. This was now dropped
> from the previous version of the patch. We could add something like
> COMPATCC_CAN_LINK.
Ah, the COMPATCC_CAN_LINK idea doesn't help because an x86 gcc can still
link. Maybe only enable CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO above if CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT
was set. You could move the COMPATCC setting and export under the
same 'if' block in the Makefile.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists