linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.2 286/313] btrfs: qgroup: Fix the wrong target io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191003154601.251693714@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  3 Oct 2019 17:54:24 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 286/313] btrfs: qgroup: Fix the wrong target io_tree when freeing reserved data space

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>

commit bab32fc069ce8829c416e8737c119f62a57970f9 upstream.

[BUG]
Under the following case with qgroup enabled, if some error happened
after we have reserved delalloc space, then in error handling path, we
could cause qgroup data space leakage:

>>From btrfs_truncate_block() in inode.c:

	ret = btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(inode, &data_reserved,
					   block_start, blocksize);
	if (ret)
		goto out;

 again:
	page = find_or_create_page(mapping, index, mask);
	if (!page) {
		btrfs_delalloc_release_space(inode, data_reserved,
					     block_start, blocksize, true);
		btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), blocksize, true);
		ret = -ENOMEM;
		goto out;
	}

[CAUSE]
In the above case, btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space() will call
btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() and mark the io_tree range with
EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag.

In the error handling path, we have the following call stack:
btrfs_delalloc_release_space()
|- btrfs_free_reserved_data_space()
   |- btrsf_qgroup_free_data()
      |- __btrfs_qgroup_release_data(reserved=@...erved, free=1)
         |- qgroup_free_reserved_data(reserved=@...erved)
            |- clear_record_extent_bits();
            |- freed += changeset.bytes_changed;

However due to a completion bug, qgroup_free_reserved_data() will clear
EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag in BTRFS_I(inode)->io_failure_tree, other
than the correct BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree.
Since io_failure_tree is never marked with that flag,
btrfs_qgroup_free_data() will not free any data reserved space at all,
causing a leakage.

This type of error handling can only be triggered by errors outside of
qgroup code. So EDQUOT error from qgroup can't trigger it.

[FIX]
Fix the wrong target io_tree.

Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Fixes: bc42bda22345 ("btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup reserved space underflow by only freeing reserved ranges")
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -3469,7 +3469,7 @@ static int qgroup_free_reserved_data(str
 		 * EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED, we won't double free.
 		 * So not need to rush.
 		 */
-		ret = clear_record_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_failure_tree,
+		ret = clear_record_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree,
 				free_start, free_start + free_len - 1,
 				EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED, &changeset);
 		if (ret < 0)