[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191003154608.871521453@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 17:54:22 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.3 297/344] KEYS: trusted: correctly initialize digests and fix locking issue
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
commit 9f75c82246313d4c2a6bc77e947b45655b3b5ad5 upstream.
Commit 0b6cf6b97b7e ("tpm: pass an array of tpm_extend_digest structures to
tpm_pcr_extend()") modifies tpm_pcr_extend() to accept a digest for each
PCR bank. After modification, tpm_pcr_extend() expects that digests are
passed in the same order as the algorithms set in chip->allocated_banks.
This patch fixes two issues introduced in the last iterations of the patch
set: missing initialization of the TPM algorithm ID in the tpm_digest
structures passed to tpm_pcr_extend() by the trusted key module, and
unreleased locks in the TPM driver due to returning from tpm_pcr_extend()
without calling tpm_put_ops().
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 0b6cf6b97b7e ("tpm: pass an array of tpm_extend_digest structures to tpm_pcr_extend()")
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Suggested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 14 +++++++++-----
security/keys/trusted.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
@@ -320,18 +320,22 @@ int tpm_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip
if (!chip)
return -ENODEV;
- for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++)
- if (digests[i].alg_id != chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id)
- return -EINVAL;
+ for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++) {
+ if (digests[i].alg_id != chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id) {
+ rc = EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
rc = tpm2_pcr_extend(chip, pcr_idx, digests);
- tpm_put_ops(chip);
- return rc;
+ goto out;
}
rc = tpm1_pcr_extend(chip, pcr_idx, digests[0].digest,
"attempting extend a PCR value");
+
+out:
tpm_put_ops(chip);
return rc;
}
--- a/security/keys/trusted.c
+++ b/security/keys/trusted.c
@@ -1228,11 +1228,16 @@ hashalg_fail:
static int __init init_digests(void)
{
+ int i;
+
digests = kcalloc(chip->nr_allocated_banks, sizeof(*digests),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!digests)
return -ENOMEM;
+ for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++)
+ digests[i].alg_id = chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id;
+
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists