lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu,  3 Oct 2019 17:53:49 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Doug Reiland <doug.reiland@...el.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.3 264/344] KVM: x86: Manually calculate reserved bits when loading PDPTRS

From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>

commit 16cfacc8085782dab8e365979356ce1ca87fd6cc upstream.

Manually generate the PDPTR reserved bit mask when explicitly loading
PDPTRs.  The reserved bits that are being tracked by the MMU reflect the
current paging mode, which is unlikely to be PAE paging in the vast
majority of flows that use load_pdptrs(), e.g. CR0 and CR4 emulation,
__set_sregs(), etc...  This can cause KVM to incorrectly signal a bad
PDPTR, or more likely, miss a reserved bit check and subsequently fail
a VM-Enter due to a bad VMCS.GUEST_PDPTR.

Add a one off helper to generate the reserved bits instead of sharing
code across the MMU's calculations and the PDPTR emulation.  The PDPTR
reserved bits are basically set in stone, and pushing a helper into
the MMU's calculation adds unnecessary complexity without improving
readability.

Oppurtunistically fix/update the comment for load_pdptrs().

Note, the buggy commit also introduced a deliberate functional change,
"Also remove bit 5-6 from rsvd_bits_mask per latest SDM.", which was
effectively (and correctly) reverted by commit cd9ae5fe47df ("KVM: x86:
Fix page-tables reserved bits").  A bit of SDM archaeology shows that
the SDM from late 2008 had a bug (likely a copy+paste error) where it
listed bits 6:5 as AVL and A for PDPTEs used for 4k entries but reserved
for 2mb entries.  I.e. the SDM contradicted itself, and bits 6:5 are and
always have been reserved.

Fixes: 20c466b56168d ("KVM: Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs()")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Reported-by: Doug Reiland <doug.reiland@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -674,8 +674,14 @@ static int kvm_read_nested_guest_page(st
 				       data, offset, len, access);
 }
 
+static inline u64 pdptr_rsvd_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return rsvd_bits(cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu), 63) | rsvd_bits(5, 8) |
+	       rsvd_bits(1, 2);
+}
+
 /*
- * Load the pae pdptrs.  Return true is they are all valid.
+ * Load the pae pdptrs.  Return 1 if they are all valid, 0 otherwise.
  */
 int load_pdptrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu, unsigned long cr3)
 {
@@ -694,8 +700,7 @@ int load_pdptrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, s
 	}
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pdpte); ++i) {
 		if ((pdpte[i] & PT_PRESENT_MASK) &&
-		    (pdpte[i] &
-		     vcpu->arch.mmu->guest_rsvd_check.rsvd_bits_mask[0][2])) {
+		    (pdpte[i] & pdptr_rsvd_bits(vcpu))) {
 			ret = 0;
 			goto out;
 		}


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ