linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.2 208/313] btrfs: tree-checker: Add ROOT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191003154553.469944753@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  3 Oct 2019 17:53:06 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jungyeon Yoon <jungyeon.yoon@...il.com>,
        Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 208/313] btrfs: tree-checker: Add ROOT_ITEM check

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>

[ Upstream commit 259ee7754b6793af8bdd77f9ca818bc41cfe9541 ]

This patch will introduce ROOT_ITEM check, which includes:
- Key->objectid and key->offset check
  Currently only some easy check, e.g. 0 as rootid is invalid.

- Item size check
  Root item size is fixed.

- Generation checks
  Generation, generation_v2 and last_snapshot should not be greater than
  super generation + 1

- Level and alignment check
  Level should be in [0, 7], and bytenr must be aligned to sector size.

- Flags check

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203261
Reported-by: Jungyeon Yoon <jungyeon.yoon@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index ccd5706199d76..d83adda6c090a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -821,6 +821,95 @@ static int check_inode_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int check_root_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
+			   int slot)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = leaf->fs_info;
+	struct btrfs_root_item ri;
+	const u64 valid_root_flags = BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_RDONLY |
+				     BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD;
+
+	/* No such tree id */
+	if (key->objectid == 0) {
+		generic_err(leaf, slot, "invalid root id 0");
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Some older kernel may create ROOT_ITEM with non-zero offset, so here
+	 * we only check offset for reloc tree whose key->offset must be a
+	 * valid tree.
+	 */
+	if (key->objectid == BTRFS_TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID && key->offset == 0) {
+		generic_err(leaf, slot, "invalid root id 0 for reloc tree");
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+
+	if (btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot) != sizeof(ri)) {
+		generic_err(leaf, slot,
+			    "invalid root item size, have %u expect %zu",
+			    btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot), sizeof(ri));
+	}
+
+	read_extent_buffer(leaf, &ri, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, slot),
+			   sizeof(ri));
+
+	/* Generation related */
+	if (btrfs_root_generation(&ri) >
+	    btrfs_super_generation(fs_info->super_copy) + 1) {
+		generic_err(leaf, slot,
+			"invalid root generation, have %llu expect (0, %llu]",
+			    btrfs_root_generation(&ri),
+			    btrfs_super_generation(fs_info->super_copy) + 1);
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+	if (btrfs_root_generation_v2(&ri) >
+	    btrfs_super_generation(fs_info->super_copy) + 1) {
+		generic_err(leaf, slot,
+		"invalid root v2 generation, have %llu expect (0, %llu]",
+			    btrfs_root_generation_v2(&ri),
+			    btrfs_super_generation(fs_info->super_copy) + 1);
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+	if (btrfs_root_last_snapshot(&ri) >
+	    btrfs_super_generation(fs_info->super_copy) + 1) {
+		generic_err(leaf, slot,
+		"invalid root last_snapshot, have %llu expect (0, %llu]",
+			    btrfs_root_last_snapshot(&ri),
+			    btrfs_super_generation(fs_info->super_copy) + 1);
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+
+	/* Alignment and level check */
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(btrfs_root_bytenr(&ri), fs_info->sectorsize)) {
+		generic_err(leaf, slot,
+		"invalid root bytenr, have %llu expect to be aligned to %u",
+			    btrfs_root_bytenr(&ri), fs_info->sectorsize);
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+	if (btrfs_root_level(&ri) >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL) {
+		generic_err(leaf, slot,
+			    "invalid root level, have %u expect [0, %u]",
+			    btrfs_root_level(&ri), BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1);
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+	if (ri.drop_level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL) {
+		generic_err(leaf, slot,
+			    "invalid root level, have %u expect [0, %u]",
+			    ri.drop_level, BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1);
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+
+	/* Flags check */
+	if (btrfs_root_flags(&ri) & ~valid_root_flags) {
+		generic_err(leaf, slot,
+			    "invalid root flags, have 0x%llx expect mask 0x%llx",
+			    btrfs_root_flags(&ri), valid_root_flags);
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Common point to switch the item-specific validation.
  */
@@ -856,6 +945,9 @@ static int check_leaf_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 	case BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY:
 		ret = check_inode_item(leaf, key, slot);
 		break;
+	case BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY:
+		ret = check_root_item(leaf, key, slot);
+		break;
 	}
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.20.1