linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.2 139/313] PM / devfreq: passive: Use non-devm notifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu,  3 Oct 2019 17:51:57 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 139/313] PM / devfreq: passive: Use non-devm notifiers

From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>

[ Upstream commit 0ef7c7cce43f6ecc2b96d447e69b2900a9655f7c ]

The devfreq passive governor registers and unregisters devfreq
transition notifiers on DEVFREQ_GOV_START/GOV_STOP using devm wrappers.

If devfreq itself is registered with devm then a warning is triggered on
rmmod from devm_devfreq_unregister_notifier. Call stack looks like this:

	devm_devfreq_unregister_notifier+0x30/0x40
	devfreq_passive_event_handler+0x4c/0x88
	devfreq_remove_device.part.8+0x6c/0x9c
	devm_devfreq_dev_release+0x18/0x20
	release_nodes+0x1b0/0x220
	devres_release_all+0x78/0x84
	device_release_driver_internal+0x100/0x1c0
	driver_detach+0x4c/0x90
	bus_remove_driver+0x7c/0xd0
	driver_unregister+0x2c/0x58
	platform_driver_unregister+0x10/0x18
	imx_devfreq_platdrv_exit+0x14/0xd40 [imx_devfreq]

This happens because devres_release_all will first remove all the nodes
into a separate todo list so the nested devres_release from
devm_devfreq_unregister_notifier won't find anything.

Fix the warning by calling the non-devm APIS for frequency notification.
Using devm wrappers is not actually useful for a governor anyway: it
relies on the devfreq core to correctly match the GOV_START/GOV_STOP
notifications.

Fixes: 996133119f57 ("PM / devfreq: Add new passive governor")
Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
index 58308948b8637..da485477065c5 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
@@ -165,12 +165,12 @@ static int devfreq_passive_event_handler(struct devfreq *devfreq,
 			p_data->this = devfreq;
 
 		nb->notifier_call = devfreq_passive_notifier_call;
-		ret = devm_devfreq_register_notifier(dev, parent, nb,
+		ret = devfreq_register_notifier(parent, nb,
 					DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
 		break;
 	case DEVFREQ_GOV_STOP:
-		devm_devfreq_unregister_notifier(dev, parent, nb,
-					DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
+		WARN_ON(devfreq_unregister_notifier(parent, nb,
+					DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER));
 		break;
 	default:
 		break;
-- 
2.20.1