[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <618064891.1049.1570123274780.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 13:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: paulmck <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
dipankar <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
fweisbec <fweisbec@...il.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Joel Fernandes, Google" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Shane M Seymour <shane.seymour@....com>,
Martin <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Upgrade rcu_swap_protected() to
rcu_replace()
----- On Oct 3, 2019, at 12:52 PM, paulmck paulmck@...nel.org wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:35:30PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> ----- On Oct 2, 2019, at 9:43 PM, paulmck paulmck@...nel.org wrote:
>>
>> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
>> >
>> > Although the rcu_swap_protected() macro follows the example of swap(),
>> > the interactions with RCU make its update of its argument somewhat
>> > counter-intuitive. This commit therefore introduces an rcu_replace()
>> > that returns the old value of the RCU pointer instead of doing the
>> > argument update. Once all the uses of rcu_swap_protected() are updated
>> > to instead use rcu_replace(), rcu_swap_protected() will be removed.
>>
>> We expose the rcu_xchg_pointer() API in liburcu (Userspace RCU) project.
>> Any reason for not going that way and keep the kernel and user-space RCU
>> APIs alike ?
>>
>> It's of course fine if they diverge, but we might want to at least consider
>> if using the same API name would be OK.
>
> Different semantics. An rcu_xchg_pointer() allows concurrent updates,
> and rcu_replace() does not.
>
> But yes, if someone needs the concurrent updates, rcu_xchg_pointer()
> would certainly be my choice for the name.
Then considering that its assignment counterpart is "rcu_assign_pointer()"
(and not "rcu_assign()"), would "rcu_replace_pointer()" be less ambiguous
about its intended use ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Link:
>> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiAsJLw1egFEE=Z7-GGtM6wcvtyytXZA1+BHqta4gg6Hw@mail.gmail.com/
>> > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
>> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
>> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
>> > Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
>> > Cc: Shane M Seymour <shane.seymour@....com>
>> > Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
>> > ---
>> > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
>> > index 75a2ede..3b73287 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
>> > @@ -383,6 +383,24 @@ do { \
>> > } while (0)
>> >
>> > /**
>> > + * rcu_replace() - replace an RCU pointer, returning its old value
>> > + * @rcu_ptr: RCU pointer, whose old value is returned
>> > + * @ptr: regular pointer
>> > + * @c: the lockdep conditions under which the dereference will take place
>> > + *
>> > + * Perform a replacement, where @rcu_ptr is an RCU-annotated
>> > + * pointer and @c is the lockdep argument that is passed to the
>> > + * rcu_dereference_protected() call used to read that pointer. The old
>> > + * value of @rcu_ptr is returned, and @rcu_ptr is set to @ptr.
>> > + */
>> > +#define rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, c) \
>> > +({ \
>> > + typeof(ptr) __tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), (c)); \
>> > + rcu_assign_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr)); \
>> > + __tmp; \
>> > +})
>> > +
>> > +/**
>> > * rcu_swap_protected() - swap an RCU and a regular pointer
>> > * @rcu_ptr: RCU pointer
>> > * @ptr: regular pointer
>> > --
>> > 2.9.5
>>
>> --
>> Mathieu Desnoyers
>> EfficiOS Inc.
> > http://www.efficios.com
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists