linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 117/129] btrfs: Relinquish CPUs in btrfs_compare

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191003154413.378597779@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  3 Oct 2019 17:54:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 117/129] btrfs: Relinquish CPUs in btrfs_compare_trees

From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>

commit 6af112b11a4bc1b560f60a618ac9c1dcefe9836e upstream.

When doing any form of incremental send the parent and the child trees
need to be compared via btrfs_compare_trees. This  can result in long
loop chains without ever relinquishing the CPU. This causes softlockup
detector to trigger when comparing trees with a lot of items. Example
report:

watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 24s! [snapperd:16153]
CPU: 0 PID: 16153 Comm: snapperd Not tainted 5.2.9-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased)
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : __ll_sc_arch_atomic_sub_return+0x14/0x20
lr : btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages+0xe0/0x1e8 [btrfs]
sp : ffff00001273b7e0
Call trace:
 __ll_sc_arch_atomic_sub_return+0x14/0x20
 release_extent_buffer+0xdc/0x120 [btrfs]
 free_extent_buffer.part.0+0xb0/0x118 [btrfs]
 free_extent_buffer+0x24/0x30 [btrfs]
 btrfs_release_path+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs]
 btrfs_free_path.part.0+0x20/0x40 [btrfs]
 btrfs_free_path+0x24/0x30 [btrfs]
 get_inode_info+0xa8/0xf8 [btrfs]
 finish_inode_if_needed+0xe0/0x6d8 [btrfs]
 changed_cb+0x9c/0x410 [btrfs]
 btrfs_compare_trees+0x284/0x648 [btrfs]
 send_subvol+0x33c/0x520 [btrfs]
 btrfs_ioctl_send+0x8a0/0xaf0 [btrfs]
 btrfs_ioctl+0x199c/0x2288 [btrfs]
 do_vfs_ioctl+0x4b0/0x820
 ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb8
 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38
 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x7c/0x188
 el0_svc_handler+0x34/0x90
 el0_svc+0x8/0xc

Fix this by adding a call to cond_resched at the beginning of the main
loop in btrfs_compare_trees.

Fixes: 7069830a9e38 ("Btrfs: add btrfs_compare_trees function")
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -5467,6 +5467,7 @@ int btrfs_compare_trees(struct btrfs_roo
 	advance_left = advance_right = 0;

 	while (1) {
+		cond_resched();
 		if (advance_left && !left_end_reached) {
 			ret = tree_advance(left_root, left_path, &left_level,
 					left_root_level,