[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191003154345.384807398@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 17:53:01 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 058/129] md: dont call spare_active in md_reap_sync_thread if all member devices cant work
From: Guoqing Jiang <jgq516@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 0d8ed0e9bf9643f27f4816dca61081784dedb38d ]
When add one disk to array, the md_reap_sync_thread is responsible
to activate the spare and set In_sync flag for the new member in
spare_active().
But if raid1 has one member disk A, and disk B is added to the array.
Then we offline A before all the datas are synchronized from A to B,
obviously B doesn't have the latest data as A, but B is still marked
with In_sync flag.
So let's not call spare_active under the condition, otherwise B is
still showed with 'U' state which is not correct.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/md/md.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 765a16dab2e5f..c1c514792457a 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -8573,7 +8573,8 @@ void md_reap_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev)
/* resync has finished, collect result */
md_unregister_thread(&mddev->sync_thread);
if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery) &&
- !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery)) {
+ !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery) &&
+ mddev->degraded != mddev->raid_disks) {
/* success...*/
/* activate any spares */
if (mddev->pers->spare_active(mddev)) {
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists