[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191003180528.GH4643@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 20:05:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
paulmck@...nel.org, rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
dipankar <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
fweisbec <fweisbec@...il.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Joel Fernandes, Google" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Shane M Seymour <shane.seymour@....com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Upgrade rcu_swap_protected() to
rcu_replace()
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:31:38PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> We might want to consider simply using xchg() here.
As stated elsewhere, xchg() is an atomic op with full ordering, IOW it
is stupid expensive for what needs to be done.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists