[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <KU1P153MB01663CA0F105C416555A06FFBF9F0@KU1P153MB0166.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 20:17:07 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 08/13] vsock: move vsock_insert_unbound() in the
vsock_create()
> From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 4:27 AM
>
> vsock_insert_unbound() was called only when 'sock' parameter of
> __vsock_create() was not null. This only happened when
> __vsock_create() was called by vsock_create().
>
> In order to simplify the multi-transports support, this patch
> moves vsock_insert_unbound() at the end of vsock_create().
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists