[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191003201835.19903-1-longman@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:18:35 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] lib/smp_processor_id: Don't use cpumask_equal()
The check_preemption_disabled() function uses cpumask_equal() to see
if the task is bounded to the current CPU only. cpumask_equal() calls
memcmp() to do the comparison. As x86 doesn't have __HAVE_ARCH_MEMCMP,
the slow memcmp() function in lib/string.c is used.
On a RT kernel that call check_preemption_disabled() very frequently,
below is the perf-record output of a certain microbenchmark:
42.75% 2.45% testpmd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] check_preemption_disabled
40.01% 39.97% testpmd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] memcmp
We should avoid calling memcmp() in performance critical path. So the
cpumask_equal() call is now replaced with an equivalent check that
makes no external function call.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
lib/smp_processor_id.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/smp_processor_id.c b/lib/smp_processor_id.c
index 60ba93fc42ce..3fee05ac92f8 100644
--- a/lib/smp_processor_id.c
+++ b/lib/smp_processor_id.c
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ unsigned int check_preemption_disabled(const char *what1, const char *what2)
* Kernel threads bound to a single CPU can safely use
* smp_processor_id():
*/
- if (cpumask_equal(current->cpus_ptr, cpumask_of(this_cpu)))
+ if ((current->nr_cpus_allowed == 1) &&
+ cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, current->cpus_ptr))
goto out;
/*
--
2.18.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists