[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191003075118.6257-1-andrzej.p@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 09:51:18 +0200
From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>
To: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel@...labora.com,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm: Fix comment doc for format_modifiers
To human readers
"array of struct drm_format modifiers" is almost indistinguishable from
"array of struct drm_format_modifiers", especially given that
struct drm_format_modifier does exist.
And indeed the parameter passes an array of uint64_t rather than an array
of structs, but the first words of the comment suggest that it passes
an array of structs.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c
index d6ad60ab0d38..0d4f9172c0dd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int create_in_format_blob(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_plane *plane
* @funcs: callbacks for the new plane
* @formats: array of supported formats (DRM_FORMAT\_\*)
* @format_count: number of elements in @formats
- * @format_modifiers: array of struct drm_format modifiers terminated by
+ * @format_modifiers: array of format modifiers terminated by
* DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID
* @type: type of plane (overlay, primary, cursor)
* @name: printf style format string for the plane name, or NULL for default name
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists