[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191003080148.GL2819@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:01:48 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Mani, Rajmohan" <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
"Jamet, Michael" <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@...look.com.au>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Mario.Limonciello@...l.com" <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>,
Anthony Wong <anthony.wong@...onical.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 19/22] thunderbolt: Add support for Time Management
Unit
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:52:06PM +0000, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
> > + /* Enable TMU if it is off */
> > + if (!tb_switch_tmu_is_enabled(tb->root_switch))
>
> To be consistent with the implementation of tb_switch_tmu_disable(), should we
> move the above check inside tb_switch_tmu_enable()?
Yes, I think it makes sense.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists