| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <400cff22991252ddff7777e51f17dec2ce6e06f5.camel@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 10:10:24 +0200
From: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...sung.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...sung.com>,
myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, inki.dae@...sung.com,
sw0312.kim@...sung.com, georgi.djakov@...aro.org,
leonard.crestez@....com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, krzk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] devfreq: exynos-bus: Clean up code
Hi,
On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 11:22 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Artur,
>
> On 19. 9. 19. 오후 11:22, Artur Świgoń wrote:
> > From: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...tner.samsung.com>
> >
> > This patch adds minor improvements to the exynos-bus driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...tner.samsung.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 66 ++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > index 60ad4319fd80..8d44810cac69 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > @@ -15,11 +15,10 @@
> > #include <linux/device.h>
> > #include <linux/export.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > -#include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > #define DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO 40
> >
> > @@ -178,7 +177,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> > struct device *dev = bus->dev;
> > struct opp_table *opp_table;
> > const char *vdd = "vdd";
> > - int i, ret, count, size;
> > + int i, ret, count;
> >
> > opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, &vdd, 1);
> > if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
> > @@ -201,8 +200,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> > }
> > bus->edev_count = count;
> >
> > - size = sizeof(*bus->edev) * count;
> > - bus->edev = devm_kzalloc(dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + bus->edev = devm_kcalloc(dev, count, sizeof(*bus->edev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!bus->edev) {
> > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > goto err_regulator;
> > @@ -301,10 +299,9 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> > profile->exit = exynos_bus_exit;
> >
> > ondemand_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ondemand_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!ondemand_data) {
> > - ret = -ENOMEM;
> > - goto err;
> > - }
> > + if (!ondemand_data)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > ondemand_data->upthreshold = 40;
> > ondemand_data->downdifferential = 5;
> >
> > @@ -314,8 +311,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> > ondemand_data);
> > if (IS_ERR(bus->devfreq)) {
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to add devfreq device\n");
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(bus->devfreq);
> > - goto err;
> > + return PTR_ERR(bus->devfreq);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -325,16 +321,13 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> > ret = exynos_bus_enable_edev(bus);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to enable devfreq-event devices\n");
> > - goto err;
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > ret = exynos_bus_set_event(bus);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to set event to devfreq-event devices\n");
> > - goto err;
>
> Instead of removing 'goto err', just return err as I commented[1] on v1.
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/26/331
>
> > - }
> >
> > -err:
> > return ret;
>
> And you just keep 'return ret' or you can change it as 'return 0'.
OK, I went for:
ret = exynos_bus_set_event(bus);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to set event to devfreq-event devices\n");
return ret;
}
return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -344,7 +337,6 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> > struct device *dev = bus->dev;
> > struct devfreq_passive_data *passive_data;
> > struct devfreq *parent_devfreq;
> > - int ret = 0;
> >
> > /* Initialize the struct profile and governor data for passive device */
> > profile->target = exynos_bus_target;
> > @@ -352,30 +344,26 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> >
> > /* Get the instance of parent devfreq device */
> > parent_devfreq = devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle(dev, 0);
> > - if (IS_ERR(parent_devfreq)) {
> > - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > - goto err;
> > - }
> > + if (IS_ERR(parent_devfreq))
> > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >
> > passive_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*passive_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!passive_data) {
> > - ret = -ENOMEM;
> > - goto err;
> > - }
> > + if (!passive_data)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > passive_data->parent = parent_devfreq;
> >
> > /* Add devfreq device for exynos bus with passive governor */
> > - bus->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(dev, profile, DEVFREQ_GOV_PASSIVE,
> > + bus->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(dev, profile,
> > + DEVFREQ_GOV_PASSIVE,
> > passive_data);
> > if (IS_ERR(bus->devfreq)) {
> > dev_err(dev,
> > "failed to add devfreq dev with passive governor\n");
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(bus->devfreq);
> > - goto err;
> > + return PTR_ERR(bus->devfreq);
> > }
> >
> > -err:
> > - return ret;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > @@ -393,18 +381,18 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - bus = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*bus), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + bus = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bus), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!bus)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > mutex_init(&bus->lock);
> > - bus->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + bus->dev = dev;
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bus);
> >
> > profile = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*profile), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!profile)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "devfreq", 0);
> > + node = of_parse_phandle(np, "devfreq", 0);
> > if (node) {
> > of_node_put(node);
> > passive = true;
> > @@ -461,12 +449,10 @@ static int exynos_bus_resume(struct device *dev)
> > int ret;
> >
> > ret = exynos_bus_enable_edev(bus);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to enable the devfreq-event devices\n");
> > - return ret;
>
> Keep the 'return ret' if error happen as I commented[1] on v1.
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/26/331
>
> > - }
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return ret;
>
> And you just keep 'return 0' or you can change it as 'return ret'.
OK, I kept the original code:
ret = exynos_bus_enable_edev(bus);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to enable the devfreq-event devices\n");
return ret;
}
return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int exynos_bus_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > @@ -475,12 +461,10 @@ static int exynos_bus_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > int ret;
> >
> > ret = exynos_bus_disable_edev(bus);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to disable the devfreq-event devices\n");
> > - return ret;
>
> Keep the 'return ret' if error happen as I commented[1] on v1.
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/26/331
OK, I kept the original code.
> > - }
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return ret;
>
> And you just keep 'return 0' or you can change it as 'return ret'.
>
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> >
>
>
Best regards,
--
Artur Świgoń
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists