[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191003154338.259710635@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 17:53:50 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...onical.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 87/99] alarmtimer: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...onical.com>
commit f18ddc13af981ce3c7b7f26925f099e7c6929aba upstream.
ENOTSUPP is not supposed to be returned to userspace. This was found on an
OpenPower machine, where the RTC does not support set_alarm.
On that system, a clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM, ...) results in
"524 Unknown error 524"
Replace it with EOPNOTSUPP which results in the expected "95 Operation not
supported" error.
Fixes: 1c6b39ad3f01 (alarmtimers: Return -ENOTSUPP if no RTC device is present)
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190903171802.28314-1-cascardo@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/time/alarmtimer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ static int alarm_timer_create(struct k_i
struct alarm_base *base;
if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev())
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (!capable(CAP_WAKE_ALARM))
return -EPERM;
@@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ static int alarm_timer_nsleep(const cloc
struct restart_block *restart;
if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev())
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (flags & ~TIMER_ABSTIME)
return -EINVAL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists