lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191003154409.194095223@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  3 Oct 2019 17:53:53 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Amadeusz Sławiński 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 110/129] ASoC: Intel: Fix use of potentially uninitialized variable

From: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@...el.com>

commit 810f3b860850148788fc1ed8a6f5f807199fed65 upstream.

If ipc->ops.reply_msg_match is NULL, we may end up using uninitialized
mask value.

reported by smatch:
sound/soc/intel/common/sst-ipc.c:266 sst_ipc_reply_find_msg() error: uninitialized symbol 'mask'.

Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190827141712.21015-3-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 sound/soc/intel/common/sst-ipc.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/sound/soc/intel/common/sst-ipc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/common/sst-ipc.c
@@ -211,6 +211,8 @@ struct ipc_message *sst_ipc_reply_find_m
 
 	if (ipc->ops.reply_msg_match != NULL)
 		header = ipc->ops.reply_msg_match(header, &mask);
+	else
+		mask = (u64)-1;
 
 	if (list_empty(&ipc->rx_list)) {
 		dev_err(ipc->dev, "error: rx list empty but received 0x%llx\n",


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ