linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 130/185] raid5: dont increment read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu,  3 Oct 2019 17:53:28 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@...hat.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 130/185] raid5: dont increment read_errors on EILSEQ return

From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit b76b4715eba0d0ed574f58918b29c1b2f0fa37a8 ]

While MD continues to count read errors returned by the lower layer.
If those errors are -EILSEQ, instead of -EIO, it should NOT increase
the read_errors count.

When RAID6 is set up on dm-integrity target that detects massive
corruption, the leg will be ejected from the array.  Even if the
issue is correctable with a sector re-write and the array has
necessary redundancy to correct it.

The leg is ejected because it runs up the rdev->read_errors beyond
conf->max_nr_stripes.  The return status in dm-drypt when there is
a data integrity error is -EILSEQ (BLK_STS_PROTECTION).

Signed-off-by: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index cc0bd528136db..9f2059e185f7f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2538,7 +2538,8 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi)
 		int set_bad = 0;

 		clear_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &sh->dev[i].flags);
-		atomic_inc(&rdev->read_errors);
+		if (!(bi->bi_status == BLK_STS_PROTECTION))
+			atomic_inc(&rdev->read_errors);
 		if (test_bit(R5_ReadRepl, &sh->dev[i].flags))
 			pr_warn_ratelimited(
 				"md/raid:%s: read error on replacement device (sector %llu on %s).\n",
-- 
2.20.1