linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.2 000/313] 5.2.19-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Oct 2019 09:55:34 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.2 000/313] 5.2.19-stable review

On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 04:51:34PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org> writes:
> 
> > stable-rc/linux-5.2.y boot: 136 boots: 1 failed, 126 passed with 9 offline (v5.2.18-314-g2c8369f13ff8)
> >
> > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-5.2.y/kernel/v5.2.18-314-g2c8369f13ff8/
> > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-5.2.y/kernel/v5.2.18-314-g2c8369f13ff8/
> >
> > Tree: stable-rc
> > Branch: linux-5.2.y
> > Git Describe: v5.2.18-314-g2c8369f13ff8
> > Git Commit: 2c8369f13ff8c1375690964c79ffdc0e41ab4f97
> > Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > Tested: 80 unique boards, 27 SoC families, 16 builds out of 209
> 
> TL;DR; all is well.
> 
> > Boot Failure Detected:
> >
> > arm64:
> >     defconfig:
> >         gcc-8:
> >             rk3399-firefly: 1 failed lab
> 
> There's a known issue on this board I've been trying to debug with the
> mediatek maintainers, and we're not sure yet if it's a kernel issue or
> a hardware issue on my board, but for now, nothing to worry about for
> stable.

Thanks for the explaination and summary!

greg k-h