[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191004112237.GA19463@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 13:22:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/ftrace: Use text_poke()
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 06:10:45PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> But still, we are going from 120 to 660 IPIs for every CPU. Not saying
> it's a problem, but something that we should note. Someone (those that
> don't like kernel interference) may complain.
It is machine wide function tracing, interference is going to happen..
:-)
Anyway, we can grow the batch size if sufficient benefit can be shown to
exist.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists