lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGZ6i=2F-7K=Mpcj+2WYjDynmLEC5XR_yJdfHjjb81rPZ58i+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:47:42 +0800
From:   Kyle Tso <kyletso@...gle.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>,
        Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] tcpm: AMS and Collision Avoidance

Hi Hans,

It seems that there is a bug in the patch. Thank you for catching this!
I will revise the patch and upload it again.





On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:38 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 03-10-2019 12:04, Kyle Tso wrote:
> > Hi Hans
> >
> > Could you append the TCPM log?
>
> I've attached both good and bad logs, both start with plugging in
> one of these PD charging pass-through + USB-3 + HDMI out dongles.
>
> at a quick glance the problem
> seems to be that with the 2 AMS patches added we stop transmitting
> after:
>
> [  137.751964] Rx VDM cmd 0xff018144 type 1 cmd 4 len 1
>
> Where as the good logs still transmits (and receives) a couple of
> packets extra after this:
>
> [ 4475.965108] Rx VDM cmd 0xff018144 type 1 cmd 4 len 1
> [ 4475.965224] PD TX, header: 0x2f6f
> [ 4475.968979] PD TX complete, status: 0
> [ 4475.980811] PD RX, header: 0x2a4f [1]
> [ 4475.980816] Rx VDM cmd 0xff018150 type 1 cmd 16 len 2
> [ 4475.980929] PD TX, header: 0x216f
> [ 4475.984093] PD TX complete, status: 0
> [ 4475.996798] PD RX, header: 0x1c4f [1]
> [ 4475.996803] Rx VDM cmd 0xff018151 type 1 cmd 17 len 1
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 5:47 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Kyle,
> >>
> >> On 20-09-2019 05:24, Kyle Tso wrote:
> >>> *** BLURB HERE ***
> >>>
> >>> Kyle Tso (2):
> >>>     usb: typec: tcpm: AMS and Collision Avoidance
> >>>     usb: typec: tcpm: AMS for PD2.0
> >>
> >> I've finally gotten a chance to test this on one of my own devices
> >> which uses the tcpm framework for its Type-c port.
> >>
> >> I am afraid that this series breaks DP altmode support,
> >> specifically, the dp_altmode_configure() function no longer
> >> seems to get called, leading to no pin-assignment being
> >> selected by default and DP thus not working.
> >>
> >> So sorry, but I have to NACK this series since it causes
> >> regressions.
> >>
> >> It might be easiest if you can get yourself some hardware
> >> which supports DP altmode and uses the fusb302 Type-C
> >> controller (which unlike your controller is actually
> >> supported by the mainline kernel).
> >>
> >> 2 devices which have this are the original (version 1)
> >> of the GPD win and the GPD pocket. Since the version
> >> is not always clearly marked, make sure you get one which
> >> has a X7-Z8750 CPU, those are the version 1 models, you
> >> can still get these e.g. here:
> >>
> >> https://www.geekbuying.com/item/GPD-Pocket-7-Inch-Tablet-PC-Intel-Atom-X7-Z8750-8GB-128GB-375711.html
> >> https://www.geekbuying.com/item/GPD-Win-Intel-Z8750-Windows-10-4GB-64GB-Gamepad-Tablet-PC---Black-378018.html
> >>
> >> These 2 devices still need 2 minor patches to hookup the DP
> >> support, I have just finished these 2 patches up and I'm
> >> submitting them upstream today, I will Cc you on these.
> >>
> >> If you combine these with one of the many DP-charging pass-through
> >> + USB-3 out + HDMI out dongles, e.g.:
> >> https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32953320909.html
> >>
> >> And then after plugging in do:
> >>
> >> cat /sys/class/typec/port0-partner/port0-partner.0/displayport/pin_assignment
> >>
> >> This should print:
> >>
> >> C [D]
> >>
> >> But when I add your patches into the mix it prints just:
> >>
> >> C D
> >>
> >> And these debug pr_err calls never happen:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c b/drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c
> >> index 7845df030b72..d14f94078dd9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c
> >> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ static int dp_altmode_configure(struct dp_altmode *dp, u8 con)
> >>                  break;
> >>          }
> >>
> >> +       pr_err("dp_altmode_configure pin_assign %08x conf %08x\n", pin_assign, DP_CONF_GET_PIN_ASSIGN(dp->data.conf));
> >>          /* Determining the initial pin assignment. */
> >>          if (!DP_CONF_GET_PIN_ASSIGN(dp->data.conf)) {
> >>                  /* Is USB together with DP preferred */
> >> @@ -115,6 +116,8 @@ static int dp_altmode_configure(struct dp_altmode *dp, u8 con)
> >>                  else if (pin_assign & DP_PIN_ASSIGN_DP_ONLY_MASK)
> >>                          pin_assign &= DP_PIN_ASSIGN_DP_ONLY_MASK;
> >>
> >> +               pr_err("dp_altmode_configure masked pin_assign %08x\n", pin_assign);
> >> +
> >>                  if (!pin_assign)
> >>                          return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Hans
> >>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ